<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ahmed Eltawil&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ahmedeltawil.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ahmedeltawil.com</link>
	<description>Smartphone enthusiast and blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:48:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No dice for Skype &amp; Netflix on BlackBerry PlayBook by Ahmed Eltawil</title>
		<link>http://ahmedeltawil.com/2012/05/19/no-dice-for-skype-netflix-on-blackberry/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmed Eltawil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmedeltawil.com/2012/05/19/no-dice-for-skype-netflix-on-blackberry/#comment-302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UI experience on PlayBook&#039;s QNX platform so far isn&#039;t consistent at all. Yes, there are some consistent actions (like swiping from the top of an app for options), but the UI elements and icons aren&#039;t consistent like on other more popular platforms. And having to side-load Android apps messes up the experience ten fold.

At this point in time you&#039;re probably right, an Android tablet would&#039;ve offered a better experience and app selection (obviously) but you can&#039;t beat the PlayBook&#039;s price either.

I am just hoping all this BB10 hype that RIM is generating pays off in the end and doesn&#039;t end up in people&#039;s memories like WebOS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UI experience on PlayBook&#8217;s QNX platform so far isn&#8217;t consistent at all. Yes, there are some consistent actions (like swiping from the top of an app for options), but the UI elements and icons aren&#8217;t consistent like on other more popular platforms. And having to side-load Android apps messes up the experience ten fold.</p>
<p>At this point in time you&#8217;re probably right, an Android tablet would&#8217;ve offered a better experience and app selection (obviously) but you can&#8217;t beat the PlayBook&#8217;s price either.</p>
<p>I am just hoping all this BB10 hype that RIM is generating pays off in the end and doesn&#8217;t end up in people&#8217;s memories like WebOS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No dice for Skype &amp; Netflix on BlackBerry PlayBook by DM</title>
		<link>http://ahmedeltawil.com/2012/05/19/no-dice-for-skype-netflix-on-blackberry/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmedeltawil.com/2012/05/19/no-dice-for-skype-netflix-on-blackberry/#comment-301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just bought a Playbook last week for $150. (16gig).  I thought it was a steal considering the hardware specs and build quality.  I actually like QNX too.  I&#039;ve used Android and IOS extensively, and I have to say that QNX was a breath of fresh air.  Seems like something that could make substantial strides in turning a tablet into a real work machine with its multitasking abilities.  That being said, I came to the crushing reality that hardware and OS only make up for half the experience.  Apps are truly that important, and lack of an abundant app ecosystem is far more crippling than I would have ever imagined.  Don&#039;t get me wrong, the casual web browser and light emailer will have a fine time with the Playbook off the shelf, but tech heads like myself will feel incredibly restricted by the small selection of apps, as well as the obvious exclusion of many key apps and services.  Even beyond the lack of apps, often times the ones that are available are not certified apps, but rather 3rd party licensed apps.  As you mentioned, Facebook didn&#039;t make the Facebook app on the Playbook, and that becomes painfully obvious when comparing the QNX version with IOS or Android&#039;s version.  QNX apps tend to look and function like IOS or Android Beta apps from 2 years ago.  The finesse and polish are missing, as well as cutting edge functions.  Thankfully I managed to sideload a few android apps after upgrading to OS2.0, but many of the ones that I hoped to work, didn&#039;t.  The ones that do work can be a little quirky with GUI differences between QNX and Android, and the sideloaded apps appear to run in a container of sorts that sandboxes those apps into their own runtime.  While they do work, interaction with those apps always feels slightly disconnected from the rest of the OS.

All in all, I have a cheap web browser and email device.  I wouldn&#039;t necessarily include video in that list because of the lack of Netflix app support and the lack of Silverlight support (needed for web Netflix).  If I had to make the decision again, I&#039;d live with Android on the tab 7.0.  I&#039;m just happy I didn&#039;t shell out $499. for this thing back when it was released.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought a Playbook last week for $150. (16gig).  I thought it was a steal considering the hardware specs and build quality.  I actually like QNX too.  I&#8217;ve used Android and IOS extensively, and I have to say that QNX was a breath of fresh air.  Seems like something that could make substantial strides in turning a tablet into a real work machine with its multitasking abilities.  That being said, I came to the crushing reality that hardware and OS only make up for half the experience.  Apps are truly that important, and lack of an abundant app ecosystem is far more crippling than I would have ever imagined.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, the casual web browser and light emailer will have a fine time with the Playbook off the shelf, but tech heads like myself will feel incredibly restricted by the small selection of apps, as well as the obvious exclusion of many key apps and services.  Even beyond the lack of apps, often times the ones that are available are not certified apps, but rather 3rd party licensed apps.  As you mentioned, Facebook didn&#8217;t make the Facebook app on the Playbook, and that becomes painfully obvious when comparing the QNX version with IOS or Android&#8217;s version.  QNX apps tend to look and function like IOS or Android Beta apps from 2 years ago.  The finesse and polish are missing, as well as cutting edge functions.  Thankfully I managed to sideload a few android apps after upgrading to OS2.0, but many of the ones that I hoped to work, didn&#8217;t.  The ones that do work can be a little quirky with GUI differences between QNX and Android, and the sideloaded apps appear to run in a container of sorts that sandboxes those apps into their own runtime.  While they do work, interaction with those apps always feels slightly disconnected from the rest of the OS.</p>
<p>All in all, I have a cheap web browser and email device.  I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily include video in that list because of the lack of Netflix app support and the lack of Silverlight support (needed for web Netflix).  If I had to make the decision again, I&#8217;d live with Android on the tab 7.0.  I&#8217;m just happy I didn&#8217;t shell out $499. for this thing back when it was released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When will the selfishness end? by Ahmed Eltawil</title>
		<link>http://ahmedeltawil.com/2011/08/27/when-will-the-selfishness-end/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmed Eltawil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ahmedeltawil.wordpress.com/?p=473#comment-296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess only time will tell. Thanks for your input :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess only time will tell. Thanks for your input <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Delete a project saved on Project Server 2010 by Ahmed Eltawil</title>
		<link>http://ahmedeltawil.com/2010/12/23/delete-a-project-saved-on-project-server-2010/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmed Eltawil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmedeltawil.com/?p=409#comment-295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am glad I could help :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad I could help <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Delete a project saved on Project Server 2010 by Gururaj</title>
		<link>http://ahmedeltawil.com/2010/12/23/delete-a-project-saved-on-project-server-2010/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gururaj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmedeltawil.com/?p=409#comment-294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks a lot Ahmed. Accepting Microsoft is the greatest blunder made by Human Kind.

I was searching for all the possible ways to delete this project. Never would have imagined, even in my wildest dream, this to be the solution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot Ahmed. Accepting Microsoft is the greatest blunder made by Human Kind.</p>
<p>I was searching for all the possible ways to delete this project. Never would have imagined, even in my wildest dream, this to be the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When will the selfishness end? by Matthew Hodgkins</title>
		<link>http://ahmedeltawil.com/2011/08/27/when-will-the-selfishness-end/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Hodgkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ahmedeltawil.wordpress.com/?p=473#comment-288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was similar (but not as bad!) as the teenagers you describe. Moving out and becoming self independent and having to pay for everything yourself makes you change, and fast.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was similar (but not as bad!) as the teenagers you describe. Moving out and becoming self independent and having to pay for everything yourself makes you change, and fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attaching Expression Web 4 to Team Foundation 2010 by jackie</title>
		<link>http://ahmedeltawil.com/2010/12/12/attaching-expression-web-4-to-team-foundation-2010/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmedeltawil.com/?p=400#comment-260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what if i am creating a new site for the first time. how do i connect to tfs. i have team explorer installed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what if i am creating a new site for the first time. how do i connect to tfs. i have team explorer installed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Android Gingerbread, Anything but Exciting by Ahmed Eltawil</title>
		<link>http://ahmedeltawil.com/2010/12/29/android-gingerbread-anything-but-exciting/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmed Eltawil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 12:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ahmedeltawil.wordpress.com/2010/12/29/android-gingerbread-anything-but-exciting/#comment-250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel your frustration. It&#039;s one of the reasons why I had to move away from Android. Google will always remain a Search and Advertising company. Consumers and their needs is the last thing on their mind, unless it generates them more profits.

I am still shocked that they still won&#039;t support Arabic (or any left to right languages) in Android Ice Cream Sandwich.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel your frustration. It&#8217;s one of the reasons why I had to move away from Android. Google will always remain a Search and Advertising company. Consumers and their needs is the last thing on their mind, unless it generates them more profits.</p>
<p>I am still shocked that they still won&#8217;t support Arabic (or any left to right languages) in Android Ice Cream Sandwich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Android Gingerbread, Anything but Exciting by frustrated</title>
		<link>http://ahmedeltawil.com/2010/12/29/android-gingerbread-anything-but-exciting/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[frustrated]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ahmedeltawil.wordpress.com/2010/12/29/android-gingerbread-anything-but-exciting/#comment-249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salam Ahmed,
 couldnt agree more on what you wrote.. 

what shocks is that 2.2 froyo supported arabic nicely,, how come newer version 2.3 gingerbread falls back instead of improving support!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salam Ahmed,<br />
 couldnt agree more on what you wrote.. </p>
<p>what shocks is that 2.2 froyo supported arabic nicely,, how come newer version 2.3 gingerbread falls back instead of improving support!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sunday, June 26th 2011 by Seika</title>
		<link>http://ahmedeltawil.com/2011/06/27/sunday-june-26th-2011/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seika]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ahmedeltawil.wordpress.com/?p=455#comment-222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They don&#039;t, at least not in a way I imagined. Applications still don&#039;t blend into the hubs and become indistinguishable from the rest of the os.

Besides, it&#039;s a great idea for a perfect world but applications with similar function will become not just redundancy but a clutter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t, at least not in a way I imagined. Applications still don&#8217;t blend into the hubs and become indistinguishable from the rest of the os.</p>
<p>Besides, it&#8217;s a great idea for a perfect world but applications with similar function will become not just redundancy but a clutter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

